Serbia is still experiencing the largest and longest protests in recent history, with no signs that the current political and social crisis will be resolved. This leaves room for additional, potentially dangerous destabilization or even violence.
The crisis, sparked by the collapse of a canopy at Novi Sad railway station that killed 16 people in November 2024, peaked on the 15th of March in Belgrade, Serbia’s capital, with a massive student-led rally. More than 300.000 people were estimated to have participated in the protest, the largest turnout since a deadly roof collapse at a railway station last year sparked a national protest campaign.
For months, student-led protesters have organized protests across the country, staging rallies in Serbia’s major cities, but also taking their anti-corruption campaign to rural areas and small towns, which have long formed the backbone of President Aleksandar Vucic’s support. The students’ “return” to Belgrade on 15 March further intensified the growing pressure on Vučić’s rule, which had already seen several high-ranking officials, including the prime minister, resign in recent months. The Belgrade demonstration, which was likely the largest since those against the Milosevic regime, drew a diverse cross-section of society, including war veterans, and brought together people from both the far left and right.
Pro-government students and supporters of Vucic, ultranationalists, militia members, and alleged football hooligans also gathered in the capital to form barricades near the parliament building before the 15th of March, according to analysts and critics of Vucic, a dangerous move organised by the elites in power. This raised concerns about a possible clash with student-led demonstrators who planned to march past Parliament later on Saturday. During the protest, riot police were stationed in layers around the encampment and the parliament building, and analysts and experts warned that the situation could quickly escalate.
While no clashes were reported during the protest, there was a serious and very dangerous incident during the Novi Sad victims’ silence. At around 19:00, thousands of peaceful protesters scattered in one of the streets in central Belgrade, abruptly, without any reason. The students subsequently accused the authorities of using against them a kind of “sonic cannon,” a long-range acoustic device that experts claim is illegal. Videos of the moment the device was allegedly activated, causing the crowd to disperse, circulated widely on social media, with viewers shocked by disturbing footage showing the crowd suddenly dispersing in a downtown street. Hundreds of witnesses described a sound resembling a passing plane or an approaching train, which caused significant distress, panic, and some minor injuries.
Serbian politicians and police have repeatedly denied using a “sonic cannon” against protesters during the weekend’s massive anti-corruption rally in Belgrade. However, Interior Minister Ivica Dacic confirmed later that the police possessed such equipment but denied its use against protesters. Serbian authorities announced an investigation and requested assistance from the US FBI and Russia’s FSB, reflecting Serbia’s close ties with Russia despite its EU candidate status.
The alleged use of the sonic cannon, combined with the presence of pro-government counter-demonstrators in Belgrade, raised the risk of violence during Serbia’s protests. The authorities also began using more inflammatory language when referring to the protest. Government-backed media spread claims of a planned “coup” organised by the opposition, while Vucic accused demonstrators of plotting “large-scale violence”. The president also stated that he would not succumb a “Maidan-like” pressure, referencing Ukraine’s 2014 protests that ousted its pro-Kremlin leader.
Meanwhile, the ongoing political crisis showed no signs of resolution, further deepening tensions across the country. While students remained resolute in their demands, vowing to continue protesting until their requests were met, Vucic repeatedly put forward two options to resolve the crisis—both of which were strongly opposed by the opposition and the protesters. His proposals included either early elections or the formation of a new government backed by the ruling Progressive Party and the Socialists. Vucic, on the other side, firmly rejected any possibility of establishing a transitional government, a key demand of both the demonstrators and opposition leaders.
Against this backdrop, Serbia appeared to be heading for weeks of continued unrest, with tensions visibly escalating and the risk of further destabilisation growing by the day.